🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationHigh-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options Page 2

High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options

MariaRD Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 3:47 PM 9 replies 267 viewsPage 2 of 2
PeptideSynthNJ
Member
234
1,234
Aug 2024
Princeton, NJ
Jun 8, 2026 at 5:39 PM#6
MariaRD said:
The RDA is the wrong reference and it is worth understanding why.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass270 lbs230 lbs217 lbs
Fat mass120 lbs70 lbs52 lbs
Lean mass158 lbs145 lbs154 lbs
Body fat %39%31%21%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.5g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

1 21wanda_boise
Reply Quote Save Share Report
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Jun 8, 2026 at 6:23 PM#7

One thing that is still open after traveltech_sara’s answer:

How people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness?

Last edited: Jun 8, 2026 at 10:23 PM
50 20raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO, pete_nash and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MASHdoc_SA
Member
456
2,345
Aug 2024
San Antonio, TX
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:07 PM#8
PeptideSynthNJ said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

Coming at PeptideSynthNJ’s question from a different direction. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.

49 19JennaRN, LabKate, kate.chem and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
MariaRD
Member
823
4,567
Jun 2024
New Mexico
Jun 8, 2026 at 7:50 PM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

48 18rick_sfbay, maria_elpaso, anders_CPH and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jim_asheville
Member
289
1,234
Aug 2024
Asheville, NC
Jun 8, 2026 at 11:21 PM#10
MASHdoc_SA said:
Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent…

Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.

34 7LarryQC_SD, wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
Fiber supplementation for GLP-1 constipation — meta-analysis review18 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register