🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor ReviewsHow do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist

How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist

SarahChen_PharmD Sun, Jun 7, 2026 at 2:11 PM 9 replies 201 viewsPage 1 of 2
SarahChen_PharmD
VIP Member
4,567
22,341
Dec 2023
San Diego, CA
Jun 7, 2026 at 2:11 PM#1

After 3 years in the peptide community and a few expensive mistakes, I've developed a systematic checklist for evaluating new vendors. Sharing it here because I see too many people ordering based on price alone.

The SarahChen_PharmD Vendor Vetting Checklist:

TIER 1 — Deal Breakers (instant rejection if any fail):

  • [ ] Website age > 6 months (check WHOIS)
  • [ ] Accepts credit cards or PayPal (not crypto-only)
  • [ ] Provides batch-specific COAs (not generic)
  • [ ] Has at least 5 independent reviews with lab results
  • [ ] Responds to customer service inquiry within 24 hours

TIER 2 — Quality Indicators (want 4/5 minimum):

  • [ ] Third-party COA (Janoshik or PeptideMeter) available for current batches
  • [ ] Ships with cold chain packaging
  • [ ] Provides lot number and expiration date on vials
  • [ ] Has a published return/reship policy
  • [ ] Active community presence (forums, not just social media)

TIER 3 — Premium Indicators (nice to have):

  • [ ] Endotoxin testing on COA (not just HPLC purity)
  • [ ] Sterility testing documentation
  • [ ] Published reconstitution guidelines
  • [ ] US-based with verifiable address
  • [ ] Consistent pricing (no wild fluctuations)
19 14Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
WendyG_ATL
Member
1,023
5,678
Apr 2024
Georgia
Jun 7, 2026 at 2:37 PM#2

This is excellent. I'd add a few more items to the checklist:

TIER 1 additions:

  • [ ] No fake Janoshik/PeptideMeter COAs. Always email the lab directly to verify. Both labs will confirm or deny a report number within 24 hours. I've caught two vendors with fabricated reports this way.
  • [ ] No "FDA approved" or "pharmaceutical grade" claims. No compounding vendor is producing FDA-approved semaglutide. If they claim to be, they're lying about their regulatory status.

TIER 2 additions:

  • [ ] Peptide content testing (not just purity). HPLC purity tells you what percentage of the peptide is semaglutide vs impurities. But it doesn't tell you the total amount of peptide in the vial. A vial labeled 10mg might only contain 7mg of total peptide at 99% purity — that's 6.93mg of semaglutide, not 10mg.
  • [ ] Ask to see their LC-MS/MS identity confirmation. HPLC alone confirms purity but not necessarily identity. LC-MS/MS confirms the molecular weight matches semaglutide.
18 13rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
adam_van
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Vancouver, CA
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:03 PM#3

Former pharma QC analyst here. A few technical additions:

What to look for on a COA:

  1. HPLC method details: A legitimate COA should specify the column type (usually C18), mobile phase, flow rate, and detection wavelength (typically UV at 214nm or 280nm for peptides). If the COA just says "HPLC: 98.7%" without method details, it's less credible.
  2. Reference standard: Was the test run against a certified reference standard? Janoshik and PeptideMeter both use USP or EP reference standards. This matters for quantitative accuracy.
  3. Chromatogram: The actual HPLC chromatogram should be included or available on request. Look for a clean, single major peak with baseline resolution from any impurity peaks.
  4. Endotoxin (LAL) test: Should show <0.25 EU/mg for injectable peptides. This is separate from purity and relates to bacterial contamination during manufacturing.

If a vendor can't or won't provide the actual chromatogram from their third-party test, that's a yellow flag. Janoshik includes chromatograms in all their reports — ask to see it.

17 12LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
labquiet_amy
Senior Member
1,234
6,789
Mar 2024
Cambridge, MA
Jun 7, 2026 at 3:29 PM#4

adam_van — this is the kind of expert input I was hoping for. The peptide content testing point from is also crucial. Let me share a real example:

I tested a vendor's "10mg semaglutide" vial. Janoshik results:

  • HPLC purity: 98.4% — looks great, right?
  • Net peptide content: 6.8mg

So yes, the semaglutide was 98.4% pure — but there was only 6.8mg of it in a vial labeled as 10mg. That's a 32% shortfall in actual drug content. At my dose of 0.5mg/week, that's the difference between 20 weeks and 13.6 weeks of supply.

This is why I specifically request the quantitative content test from Janoshik (they call it "content by UV" on their order form). It costs an extra $20-30 but tells you EXACTLY how much peptide is in the vial.

16 11bri_stats, pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
pete_nash
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
Nashville, TN
Jun 7, 2026 at 5:52 PM#5

This is incredibly overwhelming for someone just starting out. I don't have the budget to test every vial — Janoshik testing at $80-100 per test adds up fast.

What's the minimum I should do as a new buyer?

Last edited: Jun 7, 2026 at 11:52 PM
15 10sarah.morrison, NeuroNate, JessicaH_TX and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
Telehealth provider comparison — who actually prescribes what and for how much10 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register