SallyK_inj said:

Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.

SallyK_inj said:

Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

Happy to go further on any of that.

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What a vetting checklist should actually contain, as opposed to a list of things that are easy to fake?

TirzTom said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

I read this differently from TirzTom, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.