Dr.RaviCardio said:

The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.

Dr.RaviCardio said:

The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

One thing that is still open after Dr.RaviCardio’s answer:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

Dr.PathRoch said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.