PharmD_Rodriguez said:

Insulin syringe units to mg conversion — the complete reference thread Posting this as an important update for the dosing & protocols community.

That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. The arithmetic is right and one caveat matters: a U-40 syringe changes the markings, not the volumes. If someone hands you U-40 and you read it as U-100 you will be 2.5 times out, and that error has a direction — it is always an overdose.

PharmD_Rodriguez said:

Insulin syringe units to mg conversion — the complete reference thread Posting this as an important update for the dosing & protocols community.

I am going to disagree with reconstituting low as a general rule. More diluent, more punctures, more in-use days at room temperature, and the stability trade-off is real. Precision is not the only variable being optimised.

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. Dead space is the answer to the missing dose. A fixed-needle insulin syringe holds a few microlitres in the hub and needle after the plunger bottoms out, and on small draws that is a measurable percentage of every dose. Across ten draws it adds up to most of an eleventh, which is exactly the "nine draws from a ten-dose vial" complaint. Luer-lock syringes are worse; low-dead-space fixed-needle designs are better.

SarahChen_PharmD said:

The arithmetic is right and one caveat matters: a U-40 syringe changes the markings, not the volumes.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so. Do it in two steps and it stops being confusing. First concentration: 10mg into 2ml is 5mg/ml. Then volume: a 0.5mg dose is 0.5 ÷ 5 = 0.1ml. Then units, and this is where people go wrong — a U-100 syringe is graduated in hundredths of a millilitre, so 0.1ml is 10 units. The word "units" has nothing to do with milligrams; it is a volume marking that exists because insulin happens to come at 100 units per ml.