🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer BewarePeptide Sciences quality was declining BEFORE shutdown — PeptideMeter data Page 5

Peptide Sciences quality was declining BEFORE shutdown — PeptideMeter data

PurityPaulOR Sat, May 16, 2026 at 11:00 PM 29 replies 896 viewsPage 5 of 6
PharmD_Rodriguez
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Miami, FL
May 21, 2026 at 1:44 AM#21

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight. This confirms identity — not just purity.

Why this matters: HPLC can show you a "pure" compound, but if it's pure of the WRONG compound, purity is meaningless. Mass spec at m/z 4113.58 Da confirms it's actually semaglutide. My Janoshik report includes both HPLC and mass spec.

If your testing provider only offers HPLC, consider upgrading to include mass spec for at least your first batch from a new vendor.

46 19paul_denver, TinaHashiRN, robert_kc and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MeganSA_TX
Member
634
2,890
Jun 2024
San Antonio, TX
May 21, 2026 at 1:56 PM#22
PharmD_Rodriguez said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.

47 20julia.endo, JessicaM_2024, TomFromTexas and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BiostatsBrad
Member
456
2,345
Jul 2024
Durham, NC
May 22, 2026 at 2:07 AM#23
PharmD_Rodriguez said:
Mass spectrometry confirmation for certificates of analysis: beyond HPLC purity, mass spec tells you the molecule's exact molecular weight.

Coming at PharmD_Rodriguez’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

48 21FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
May 22, 2026 at 2:18 PM#24

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

49 22cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
BariatricNurseD
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Dallas, TX
Online
May 23, 2026 at 2:29 AM#25

One thing that is still open after PharmD_Rodriguez’s answer:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

50 23Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register