One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
One thing that is still open after ingrid_STO’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.PeteFamMed said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
I read this differently from Dr.PeteFamMed, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.PeteFamMed said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Dr.PeteFamMed said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.