🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesBlood sugar used to spike to 200 after meals, now barely hits 120

Blood sugar used to spike to 200 after meals, now barely hits 120

DerekSJ_a1c Sat, May 9, 2026 at 4:03 AM 28 replies 646 viewsPage 1 of 6
DerekSJ_a1c
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
San Jose, CA
May 9, 2026 at 4:03 AM#1

A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

The question I want answered is why A1C lags the way it does, and what to look at in the meantime if you want to know sooner.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, that is a useful answer and I would rather have it.

13 8adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.NutriCornell
Senior Member
1,345
6,234
Mar 2024
Ithaca, NY
May 9, 2026 at 5:16 AM#2
DerekSJ_a1c said:
A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

My labs after 12 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.7%, fasting glucose 82 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL. My endo says these are "textbook perfect."

For context, my baseline A1C was 7.9% and fasting glucose was 117 mg/dL. The improvement has been dramatic and consistent.

12 7Dr.SleepRoch, laura_annarbor, JenMemphis and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
anna.melb_AU
Member
678
2,890
Apr 2024
Melbourne, AU
May 9, 2026 at 6:29 AM#3
Dr.NutriCornell said:
My labs after 12 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.7%, fasting glucose 82 mg/dL, fasting insulin 5 uIU/mL.

Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include:

BiomarkerAssociationEvidence Level
Baseline BMIHigher BMI → greater absolute weight lossStrong
Fasting insulinHigher insulin → better responseModerate
GLP1R gene variantsrs6923761 → variable responsePreliminary
Baseline hsCRPHigher CRP → greater CV benefitModerate
Early weight loss (4 wk)≥3% at 4 wks → strong predictor of ≥10% at 68 wksStrong

The 4-week early responder criterion is the most clinically actionable: if you haven't lost ≥3% by week 4 at a therapeutic dose, discuss optimization strategies with your provider.

11 6emma_london, tammy_FL, Dr.LipidDallas and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
oliver_london
Member
312
1,345
Aug 2024
London, UK
May 9, 2026 at 7:42 AM#4
DerekSJ_a1c said:
A1C went from 7.4 to 5.6 over nine months and my prescriber was more interested in the fasting insulin, which I did not expect.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.

10 5jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.PainCLE
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Cleveland, OH
May 9, 2026 at 2:43 PM#5

From the other side of the consultation, briefly.

PCOS success story with glycaemic control: as someone with polycystic ovary syndrome, this medication has been transformative beyond weight loss.

After 9 months: periods became regular for the first time in ever, testosterone levels normalized, acne cleared significantly, and — unexpectedly — my hormonal symptoms have almost completely resolved.

GLP-1 agonists address the insulin resistance at the root of PCOS. For PCOS patients, this isn't "just" a weight loss drug — it's treating our underlying metabolic dysfunction.

9 4amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 6 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1236

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register