MariaRD said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
MariaRD said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
MariaRD said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Coming at MariaRD’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after MariaRD’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
Dr.RaviCardio said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.