🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesRemission of T2DM on GLP-1 — what worked for you? Page 5

Remission of T2DM on GLP-1 — what worked for you?

jim_asheville Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 9:31 PM 29 replies 744 viewsPage 5 of 6
laura_annarbor
Member
189
890
Dec 2024
Ann Arbor, MI
Apr 21, 2026 at 8:07 AM#21

One thing that is still open after KevinCompounds’s answer:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

2 0labquiet_amy, emily_PDX
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.RenalNash
VIP Member
1,234
7,890
Mar 2024
Nashville, TN
Apr 22, 2026 at 7:09 AM#22
marco_milano said:
Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.

Last edited: Apr 22, 2026 at 12:09 PM
3 1pam_stl, wei_SG, cory_ATX
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Apr 23, 2026 at 6:11 AM#23
marco_milano said:
Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

4 2TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
BethLabQueen
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
May 2024
Virginia
Online
Apr 24, 2026 at 5:12 AM#24
marco_milano said:
Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

Last edited: Apr 24, 2026 at 6:12 AM
5 3cory_ATX, lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
traveltech_sara
Member
156
678
Jan 2025
Remote, USA
Apr 25, 2026 at 4:12 AM#25

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

6 4BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register