🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesType 1.5 diabetes (LADA) and GLP-1 — anyone have experience? Page 3

Type 1.5 diabetes (LADA) and GLP-1 — anyone have experience?

marcus_mpls Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 12:04 PM 12 replies 878 viewsPage 3 of 3
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Mar 8, 2026 at 2:07 PM#11
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:
Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include: Biomarker Association…

True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.

33 6hyun_seoul, jim_asheville, matt_MKE and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JenPlateau
Member
234
890
Nov 2024
Missouri
Mar 8, 2026 at 4:32 PM#12
JennaRN said:
Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 37% to 18%.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

34 7TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg, LibrarianMeg and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Mar 8, 2026 at 6:57 PM#13
Dr.SurgeonPGH said:
Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include: Biomarker Association…

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

35 8DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Mar 8, 2026 at 9:22 PM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

36 9fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 33 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Mar 8, 2026 at 11:47 PM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Carry on.

Last edited: Mar 9, 2026 at 3:47 AM
37 10PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register