Following on from carl_compliance — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
MikeNYC_runner said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
MikeNYC_runner said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMikeNYC_runner said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.