🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Counterfeit Ozempic pens circulating — looking for input Page 4

⚠ Counterfeit Ozempic pens circulating — looking for input

ingrid_STO Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM 17 replies 1,756 viewsPage 4 of 4
sarah_TO
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Toronto, CA
Mar 9, 2025 at 9:50 AM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.

3 1andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP, GraceAZ_72
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NurseLeah_Nash
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Nashville, TN
Mar 9, 2025 at 12:24 PM#17
sarah_TO said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

I read this differently from sarah_TO, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

4 2BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sean_dublin
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Dublin, IE
Mar 9, 2025 at 2:58 PM#18
sarah_TO said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

Agreeing with sarah_TO, and the qualification matters more than the agreement. Albumin binding above 99% is the whole reason weekly dosing works, and it is also why the trough matters more than the peak. People who dose late are not losing a peak, they are letting the trough fall, and the appetite effect tracks the trough.

5 3gary_naperville, sean_dublin, hannah_MT and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
TrialTracker_MD
Senior Member
2,345
15,678
Jan 2024
Maryland
Mar 9, 2025 at 5:32 PM#19
sarah_TO said:
It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

6 4Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona, stefan_berlin and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
Mar 9, 2025 at 8:06 PM#20

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

28 1PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register