zoe_NC said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
zoe_NC said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
zoe_NC said:No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from zoe_NC — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
raj_cambridge said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on raj_cambridge here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.