One thing that is still open after claudia_zurich’s answer:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Dr.PulmRoch said:

If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

I read this differently from Dr.PulmRoch, on substance rather than tone. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.

Dr.PulmRoch said:

If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.