amy_econ_NJ said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Nothing to add that would improve it.
amy_econ_NJ said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from amy_econ_NJ — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
hank_denver said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.