Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15 AM#46
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
30 3EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 11, 2024 at 9:02 AM#47
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Update, and it is the boring outcome: nothing was wrong. The measurement I was reading had moved less than its own week-to-week variation, which somebody said upthread and I did not believe.
Last edited: Apr 11, 2024 at 3:02 PM
31 4CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95 and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 13, 2024 at 11:48 AM#48
PeptideChemSF said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Last edited: Apr 13, 2024 at 5:48 PM
32 5Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO, mia_MS2 and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsApr 15, 2024 at 2:33 PM#49
PeptideChemSF said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
33 6lori_vegas, Dr.PulmRoch, maya_sedona and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 17, 2024 at 5:16 PM#50
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Last edited: Apr 17, 2024 at 10:16 PM
5 3adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report