quinn_sf said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
quinn_sf said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
quinn_sf said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
JenPlateau said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.