A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
DoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemDoseLogDan said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Reporting back.
Late follow-up. I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.