🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesPrediabetes reversal on GLP-1 — what worked for you? Page 9

Prediabetes reversal on GLP-1 — what worked for you?

MariaRD Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:51 AM 47 replies 2,239 viewsPage 9 of 10
roxy_nash
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Nashville, TN
Aug 10, 2024 at 1:05 AM#41

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

32 7josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash, tony_orlando and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
CryptoCarl
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Arizona
Aug 13, 2024 at 4:51 AM#42
VendorMark said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.

31 6MariaRD, AussieAnna, BethLabQueen and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Aug 16, 2024 at 8:39 AM#43

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

30 5RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
VanRx_Mike
Member
678
2,890
May 2024
Vancouver, CA
Aug 19, 2024 at 12:29 PM#44
VendorMark said:
If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

29 4Dr.Martinez, mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
julia.endo
Senior Member
1,890
9,012
Feb 2024
Cincinnati, OH
Aug 22, 2024 at 4:21 PM#45

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.

Last edited: Aug 22, 2024 at 10:21 PM
28 3chris_chi24, tampaLisa73, KarenAZ_mom and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register