wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Dr.LipidDallas said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.