Dr.ObesityMed said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.ObesityMed said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.ObesityMed said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after Dr.ObesityMed’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
dave_SLC said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
Pushing back on dave_SLC here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.