RegAffairsDC said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
RegAffairsDC said:I did not do what was suggested, I did something adjacent, and it worked; posting the difference in case it matters to somebody.
Coming at RegAffairsDC’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
One thing that is still open after RegAffairsDC’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?