Aug 5, 2025 at 2:19 PM#86
Following on from Dr.SportsMedIN — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
24 24tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Aug 13, 2025 at 1:29 AM#87
maya_sedona said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Last edited: Aug 13, 2025 at 3:29 AM
23 23bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london, tane_welly and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Aug 20, 2025 at 12:35 PM#88
maya_sedona said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
22 22maria_elpaso, anders_CPH, Dr.NutriCornell and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsSep 4, 2025 at 10:34 AM#90
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
49 24Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report