A1cHero_PHX said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
A1cHero_PHX said:Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Coming at A1cHero_PHX’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from A1cHero_PHX — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Dr.GutHealth said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
Pushing back on Dr.GutHealth here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.