sarah_TO said:Forest plot interpretation for the the trial evidence meta-analysis: when reading the pooled estimate, pay attention to: Point estimate (HR/RR/OR) —…
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
sarah_TO said:Forest plot interpretation for the the trial evidence meta-analysis: when reading the pooled estimate, pay attention to: Point estimate (HR/RR/OR) —…
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.GutHealth said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
Dr.GutHealth said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.