PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. No action needed from anybody.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsCanadaChris said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
CanadaChris said:No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Worth separating that from liver and MASH, which this thread keeps folding into the same question. They behave differently and the advice does not transfer.