Dr.NutriCornell said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Mine went the same way, slower.
Dr.NutriCornell said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Mine went the same way, slower.
HPLC_Greg said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
HPLC_Greg said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.