Nov 11, 2025 at 11:35 PM#46
One thing that is still open after LindaRN_retired’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
6 6DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 16, 2025 at 6:04 AM#47
Closing the loop on my own question.
Reporting back for the archive rather than for the thread: I did the narrow version of what was suggested, gave it the full interval, and it settled. Posting it because threads without a follow-up are half a thread.
5 5anders_CPH, Dr.NutriCornell, pam_stl and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 20, 2025 at 12:30 PM#48
DanielChem_CHI said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Last edited: Nov 20, 2025 at 5:30 PM
4 4TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsNov 24, 2025 at 6:54 PM#49
DanielChem_CHI said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
3 3SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison, NeuroNate
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 29, 2025 at 1:15 AM#50
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Last edited: Nov 29, 2025 at 5:15 AM
31 6BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy, emily_PDX and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report