🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareMuscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — 6 month update Page 5

Muscle protein synthesis rates on GLP-1 — 6 month update

PedsEndoPhilly Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:45 PM 31 replies 1,627 viewsPage 5 of 7
hannah_MT
New Member
23
89
Feb 2026
Bozeman, MT
Sep 23, 2025 at 6:34 AM#21
pat_auckland said:
The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Coming at pat_auckland’s question from a different direction. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

Last edited: Sep 23, 2025 at 9:34 AM
34 9nick_newbie, DadBodDave, AmyNC_wife and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
lucas_SP_BR
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
São Paulo, BR
Sep 26, 2025 at 1:56 AM#22

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

33 8Dr.ObesityLA, NurseKim_ATL, paul_denver and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DerekSJ_a1c
Member
378
1,678
Aug 2024
San Jose, CA
Sep 28, 2025 at 9:20 PM#23

One thing that is still open after pat_auckland’s answer:

Whether resistance training and protein change the ratio or only the absolute amount?

Last edited: Sep 29, 2025 at 2:20 AM
32 7rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 1, 2025 at 4:45 PM#24
lucas_SP_BR said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

31 6amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
RetaRick_CA
VIP Member
2,012
9,876
Jan 2024
California
Oct 4, 2025 at 12:12 PM#25
lucas_SP_BR said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.

30 5MounjBrad, nick_newbie, DadBodDave and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register