One thing that is still open after Dr.DermMIA’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
One thing that is still open after Dr.DermMIA’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
marco_milano said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Pushing back on marco_milano here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
marco_milano said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsmarco_milano said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.