🍪 CompoundTalk uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsPublic SquareThe "Ozempic face" phenomenon — 6 month update

The "Ozempic face" phenomenon — 6 month update

JakeBK_lifts Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 3:48 AM 21 replies 1,506 viewsPage 1 of 5
This thread is more than 11 months old. Information may be outdated. Consider searching for more recent discussions.
JakeBK_lifts
Member
523
2,345
Jul 2024
Brooklyn, NY
Jul 3, 2025 at 3:48 AM#1

Putting this up for argument rather than for agreement. I have read it twice and I am still not certain what it supports.

The dose-response is real but shallow at the top. Across STEP 1 and STEP 4 the gap between 1.7mg and 2.4mg is a couple of percentage points of body weight on average, and the average is carrying a wide spread — plenty of people at 1.7mg sit above the 2.4mg mean. If a dose is working and tolerable, "working" is the relevant variable, not "maximal".

Where I think it is weakest: the follow-up is short relative to how long people actually take these drugs, so durability is an assumption here rather than a finding.

What I actually want to know is what the dose-response curve actually looks like above 1.7mg, because the trial means hide how few people account for the extra loss. I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

Note on sourcing:
Figures above are from the primary publication rather than the press summary. If a number here disagrees with one you have, post yours and we will work out which of us is reading a secondary source.
31 9TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN, LabKate and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Jul 3, 2025 at 3:54 AM#2
JakeBK_lifts said:
The dose-response is real but shallow at the top.

All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule. Anyone who slowed the ladder for tolerability is on a different, flatter curve, and comparing yourself with the published mean will make you feel like a non-responder when you are not.

Happy to go further on any of that.

32 10Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete, LondonLisa and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.GastroMayo
VIP Member
2,345
13,456
Jan 2024
Mayo Clinic, MN
Jul 3, 2025 at 4:00 AM#3
JakeBK_lifts said:
The dose-response is real but shallow at the top.

I will push back on the "any working dose is fine" framing. The maintenance evidence sits overwhelmingly at the top studied dose, and the extension data shows regain tracking dose reduction rather than tracking stopping. Holding low is reasonable; pretending it is evidentially equivalent is not.

Last edited: Jul 3, 2025 at 9:00 AM
33 11COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Jul 3, 2025 at 4:06 AM#4

Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. Steady state is the thing most people miss. The terminal half-life is about a week, so every dose step takes four to five weeks to fully express itself. Judging a step at day ten is judging the ascent, not the plateau, and it is the single commonest reason people escalate before they needed to.

Happy to go further on any of that.

34 12pete_nash, hank_denver, carlos_SATX and 31 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sarah_TO
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Toronto, CA
Jul 3, 2025 at 4:38 AM#5
PharmacoVig_BOS said:
All true, with one condition: that curve is for people who reached the dose on schedule.

That holds for the injectable. The oral formulation has different absorption behaviour and the dose numbers are not interchangeable, which is worth saying out loud because people quote them as if they were.

35 13DanielChem_CHI, marco_milano, pam_columbus and 32 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
1235

Similar Threads

SELECT trial 4-year follow-up data released — sustained MACE reduction16 replies
GLP-1 receptor agonists and thyroid C-cell concerns — evidence review19 replies
Is there a ceiling effect for GLP-1-mediated weight loss?20 replies
Comparative pharmacokinetics: semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs retatrutide6 replies
My 18-month semaglutide journey — comprehensive data log20 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register