Feb 28, 2025 at 4:09 PM#31
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
11 9RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 2, 2025 at 8:22 PM#32
jason_sac26 said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Pushing back on jason_sac26 here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
12 10PharmD_Rodriguez, julia.endo, JessicaM_2024 and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 5, 2025 at 12:36 AM#33
jason_sac26 said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
13 11GraceAZ_72, carl_compliance, DanielChem_CHI and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMar 7, 2025 at 4:51 AM#34
jason_sac26 said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
14 12Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 9, 2025 at 9:08 AM#35
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
15 13mike_mod, SarahChen_PharmD, sarah.morrison and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report