Dr.NutriCornell said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
NauseaFreeNow said:My experience ordering cross-border ordering internationally: I've ordered from an Indian manufacturer.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Dr.NutriCornell said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Pushing back on Dr.NutriCornell here. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.