One concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

PeptideSynthNJ said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.

PeptideSynthNJ said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.

PeptideSynthNJ said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.