mona_PHX said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
mona_PHX said:That holds where the measurement is reliable.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after mona_PHX’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
SleepDoc_PDX said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on SleepDoc_PDX here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Happy to go further on any of that.