A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
FDA_TrackerJim said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
FDA_TrackerJim said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFDA_TrackerJim said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.