TrialTracker_MD said:Compounding pharmacy customer here with experience relevant to compounded supply.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TrialTracker_MD said:Compounding pharmacy customer here with experience relevant to compounded supply.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
TrialTracker_MD said:Compounding pharmacy customer here with experience relevant to compounded supply.
Coming at TrialTracker_MD’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsFollowing on from TrialTracker_MD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
stefan_berlin said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Pushing back on stefan_berlin here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.