PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
pete_RVA said:The manufacturing argument is the underrated one.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else.
PharmD_Rodriguez said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.