Dr.RaviCardio said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Dr.RaviCardio said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.LipidDallas said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.LipidDallas said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.