Dr.RaviCardio said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
HPLC_Greg said:Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Coming at HPLC_Greg’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Coming back a few months on. It held. Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.