Dr.AddMedPHL said:

Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.

Second this. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

FDA_TrackerJim said:

Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.

Coming at FDA_TrackerJim’s question from a different direction. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

Following on from FDA_TrackerJim — and this may be the naive question:

Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?

Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Carry on.