Short answer first, then the reasoning. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
What I actually want to know is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
Numbers rather than impressions, if you have them.
Dr.RenalNash said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsmona_PHX said:I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.