Taking the question as asked, rather than the general version of it. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
What would genuinely help is knowing how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
Happy to be told the question itself is wrong.
MikeFit_NJ said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsRegAffairsDC said:I have used three payment routes and the only thing that changed with each was how much leverage I had when something went wrong.
Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.