Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
What I am trying to establish is how people are thinking about the trade-off between reversibility and privacy, because you cannot have both.
Practical detail welcome, however dull — the duller the better.
This one has a reasonably settled answer, so here it is. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Dr.AddMedPHL said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
That is correct as far as it goes, and here is where it stops going. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemGraceAZ_72 said:Asked to pay by a method with no recourse, by a supplier I had used twice before without being asked, which is what made me stop.
Mine went the same way, slower. Posting only so the count is not one.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.