Dr.EndoEP said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.EndoEP said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Dr.EndoEP said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Prices dramatically below market are the strongest single signal, and the reason is arithmetic rather than suspicion. Synthesis, testing, and cold-chain shipping have floors. A price well under the floor means something was skipped, and the two things that get skipped are testing and content.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.AddMedPHL said:For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.