May 6, 2025 at 9:07 AM#41
Following on from Dr.CardioMD — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
10 8sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN and 7 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 6, 2025 at 6:05 PM#42
DoseLogDan said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on DoseLogDan here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
Last edited: May 6, 2025 at 8:05 PM
11 9bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london, tane_welly and 8 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsMay 7, 2025 at 12:01 PM#44
DoseLogDan said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Last edited: May 7, 2025 at 3:01 PM
13 11Dr.CardioMD, EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
May 7, 2025 at 8:59 PM#45
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
14 12kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report