Following on from Dr.MetabolicMD — and this may be the naive question:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
PeptideChemSF said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
PeptideChemSF said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsPeptideChemSF said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
That reframing is the part I needed. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.