sean_dublin said:

The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

wendy_avl said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Pushing back on wendy_avl here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.

wendy_avl said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

wendy_avl said:

Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.