jim_asheville said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
jim_asheville said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
TrialTracker_MD said:True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group.
That reframing is the part I needed.
jim_asheville said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently from jim_asheville, on substance rather than tone. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.